History

This Is Not Eight Years Ago

Eight years ago, I published what I considered to be a stirring post-election manifesto.  Partly it critiqued racism and sexism.  A chunk of urged readers  to support those who face bigger obstacles than straight, white, middle class men like myself.  Mostly it was a rallying cry about how to move forward in the face of Donald Trump’s victory. But early on, the piece also alluded to a 2,500 word screed I’d decided not to publish.  That one was way more critical.  Specifically, I lambasted white people: middle class liberals and Trump voters.  Both barrels blazing.  But I did not publish it because I thought it might be a bit too harsh. Eight years ago, we didn’t know what to expect, so I didn’t want to lay it on too thick.  Now we know exactly what to expect.  Eight years ago, Donald Trump was inexperienced and probably intimidated by the presidency, so he agreed to keep people around him whose purpose was to restrain him.  And to some degree they did.  This time he will face no constraints.  Eight years ago, Democrats were able to hold up large parts of Trump’s agenda.  But with the GOP about to control both houses of Congress, the only tool the Democrats will have is a Senate filibuster, and Trump will get more of what he wants, as will Republican congressional leaders.  Eight years ago, the Supreme Court was still salvageable.  No more.  Trump will likely replace two justices.  SCOTUS will continue to be a retrograde institution for at least a generation to come.  Perhaps longer. So fuck it.  I hereby present the post-election screed I wrote in November, 2016.  It is in its original form.  Eight years later, there are a couple of things I might write differently now, but for the most part, I still stand by it, and present here unedited except for tyopos.  And maybe I should have published it eight years ago.  But I didn’t.  This isn’t eight years ago, but what needs to be said still needs to be said.

This Is Not Eight Years Ago Read More »

The Ghost of Elections Past

Historians have spilled much ink analyzing and interpreting all of the U.S. presidential elections, dating back to George Washington’s first run in 1788.  But a handful of contests get more attention than others.  Some elections, besides being important for all the usual reasons, also provide insights into their eras’ zeitgeist, and proved to be influential far beyond the four years they were proscribed. 2016 and 2020 were almost certainly among those elections, though academic historians have not yet written much about them (or even Obama’s 2008 election) because we typically wait a couple of decades before sensing that an event has passed from current or recent events into our distant domain.  And anyway, it’s quite possible, even likely, that many future historians will examine the three Trump elections of 2016, 2020, and 2024 as a bundled set. But that still leaves about 55 elections historians have focused on and learned lessons from.  So here on Election Day 2024, I offer a brief digest of select, momentous presidential elections and explain how they connect to Trumpism and today’s contest. 1800– George Washington won uncontested elections in 1788 and 1792.  By 1796, he was a wildly popular war hero and founding father who could have held onto the office.  Some Americans even called for him to become a king.  But Washington valued the new republican experiment, and also wanted to go home, so he retired.  In doing so, he set an important precedent that lasted nearly 150 years.  No future president, no matter how popular, attempted to serve more than two terms until Franklin Roosevelt disregarded tradition and won four consecutive presidential elections (1932–44).

The Ghost of Elections Past Read More »

Is Trump a Fascist? It Doesn’t Matter

Some friends were recently debating whether or not Trump is actually a fascist.  Some think yes because, while he may not perfectly fit the definition, he’s rather close in many ways, and if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.  Some think not, that his beliefs and approach are just different enough to real fascism that he can be accurately called many things, but not an actual fascist. The truth is, history isn’t static.  Nothing in the 2020s can be exactly like something from the 1930s.  For example, today’s Cuban and N. Korean communism are quite different from 1920s–1930s Soviet communism.  So are today’s Cuba and  North Korea still communist or not? I’m not searching for an answer.  I’m asking that question rhetorically. Perhaps Trumpism is not exactly fascism, or perhaps it is a suitably updated version.  Either way, I think what matters most on the eve of the election is not which theoretical boxes Trump ticks, but which ideological and practical ones.  Donald Trump is a far right wing, misogynistic, homophobic racist who: radicalizes voters and politicians around phantom threats of the alien invaders making us “impure”; sets up leftist and even centrist opponents for persecution by defining them as the threat from within; erodes democratic norms through rhetoric (including calls to violence) and, when in power, through concrete political action; praises and cozies up to right wing dictators whom he clearly admires and strives to be like; and runs a kleptocratic, nepotistic regimes.

Is Trump a Fascist? It Doesn’t Matter Read More »

What White Americans Get Wrong about Racism

White Americans get a lot of things wrong about race.  And I’m not just talking about white supremacists.  Or people bitter about the supposedly undue attention, sympathy, and “breaks” that minorities receive, insisting “real” racism was a problem only in the past, because Civil Rights “fixed” it and anyone complaining about racism is just looking for an unfair edge in America’s level, color-blind playing field.  Or even those who simply minimize and downplay the existence racism. Rather, I’m talking about the small majority of whites who recognize that racism remains a big problem in America.  They often get it wrong.  How? Many of them think that race is primarily about black and brown people.  It’s not.  The fact is, racism is primarily about white people. Minorities suffer the effects of racism, and we must acknowledge and work to end that; however, you cannot cure an infection by simply placing a band-aid over the sore.  You must clean out the wound thoroughly, surgically if need be, disinfect it, and then attack the infection at its root with antibiotics.  In the old days it might have meant cutting off an appendage or limb.  Similarly, racism won’t end or even be substantially reduced by strictly focusing on the suffering of its victims and making amends.  Those are important and necessary first steps, but they don’t get at the core of the problem.  Minority suffering is racism’s result, but racism is caused by what white people think and do. Yes, white people should empathizing with black and brown people (with all human beings, really) and it is vitally important that whites listen to minority voices.  However, ending or substantially reducing racism will not come about until white people talk to each other and sort themselves out.  Because racism is a white problem.

What White Americans Get Wrong about Racism Read More »

Scroll to Top